Showing posts with label Science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Science. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

The Value of Science

Yes... there is beauty in science. This is one of my favorite poems, it is by Richard Feynman excerpted from The Value of Science.



There are the rushing waves
mountains of molecules
each stupidly minding its own business
trillions apart
yet forming white surf in unison.

Ages on ages before any eyes could see
year after year
thunderously pounding the shore as now.
For whom, for what?
On a dead planet
with no life to entertain.

Never at rest
tortured by energy
wasted prodigiously by the sun
poured into space.
A mite makes the sea roar.

Deep in the sea
all molecules repeat
the patterns of one another
till complex new ones are formed.
They make others like themselves
and a new dance starts.

Growing in size and complexity
living things
masses of atoms
DNA, protein
dancing a pattern ever more intricate.

Out of the cradle
onto dry land
here it is
standing:
atoms with consciousness;
matter with curiosity.

Stands at the sea,
wonders at wondering: I
a universe of atoms
an atom in the universe.

Monday, September 13, 2010

Chemistry 101

Here is a great new interpretation of the periodic table!


The bigger picture can be found here: http://i.imgur.com/6WuYi.jpg

Saturday, May 29, 2010

Missing Links?



Genetics shows that microevolution is true but it is hard for us to appreciate the whole picture because of our fraction of time spent on this planet in relation to the time needed for large macroevolution changes. Sure we can look at speciation in the lab with bacteria and such but people want to see larger animals, mammals, and humans to be convinced. So, do we have evidence for macroevolution? You betcha! Museums around the world are filled with thousands upon thousand of fossils showing transitional changes. Here is a select few examples showing some of the transitions we understand deeply, including the transition from water to land and from reptiles to mammals.

One of the key points to remember about fossils is that you can make predictions of where in the strata layer you can find a species. For the most part you find oldest layers being at the bottom and younger layers being at the top. And again as a point, no species has ever been found in the wrong strata layer. One way to completely debunk evolution is to find a species in the wrong order. Dawkins says the creationists should be out frantically digging up fossils to find one out of place if they want to hold to their creation and flood myth.

One of the reasons people have a hard time accepting evolution is the transition of species from water onto land. It is now well documented and understood as we now have a good amount of fossils showing the transition. In 2004, Neil Shubin made the critical discovery of the Tiktaalik, being the main transition species between water and land. Shubin was able to make predictions of what strata layer he might find this transitional species based on what layers more fish like species and more tetrapod like species lay in. And anybody could have guessed it, right smack dab in the middle! Tiktaalik's fins had more shoulder, elbow, wrist like features suggesting that it was able to lift it self up out of the water like a push-up. So here is our current understanding of great transition from water to land:



Next up we have the transitional fossils that fill in the gaps between reptiles and mammals. This fossil sequence shows how the reptilian jaw developed into the mammalian ear. Additional evidence has even shown that the same embryonic structures in the reptile also develop into the ear of mammals:



A bit of odd evolutionary history is that modern dolphins porpoises, and whales evolved from land mammals. Another clue was looking at the swimming biomechanics compared to other fish. Most fish have a side to side swimming stroke where as most land animals like otters that enter the water have an up and down swimming stroke. It goes to show that dolphins, porpoises, and whales have an up and down swimming stroke. Even further evidence is the vestigial hind limbs in whales. They still have the genetic code to build hind limbs but the gene is switched off early on leaving small femur like bones that can be seen on any whale fossil.






Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Was Darwin Wrong?


NO. THE EVIDENCE FOR EVOLUTION IS OVERWHELMING. That was the first line in large print I remember reading in the National Geographic article. Evolution is one of the most solid theories in science. Wait you said theory? Yes that's right, a scientific theory. Creationists love to play the 'just a theory card' when not knowing exactly what theory means. In science, theories are a term and model used to explain a set of facts in their relation to one another. In evolution we have thousands upon thousands of facts that have been observable over history as well as in real time. Evolutionary theory is the term used to describe the vast amount of facts and how the process works. If a college student wanted to study physics, they may have to take an atomic theory class. And just as well, Einstein's general relativity is the theory of gravitation that improved on Newton's theory of gravitation.


"Let me try to make crystal clear what is established beyond reasonable doubt, and what needs further study, about evolution. Evolution as a process that has always gone on in the history of the earth can be doubted only by those who are ignorant of the evidence or are resistant to evidence, owing to emotional blocks or to plain bigotry. By contrast, the mechanisms that bring evolution about certainly need study and clarification. There are no alternatives to evolution as history that can withstand critical examination. Yet we are constantly learning new and important facts about evolutionary mechanisms." - Theodosius Dobzhansky, Biologist. He made this quote in 1973, before the understanding of genetics, hence 'mechanisms that bring evolution about certainly need study and clarification.'

Evolution has stood up in every facet of science including archaeology, biogeography, biology, chemistry, comparative anatomy, embryology, genetics, geology, neuroscience, paleontology, pharmacology, and physics. The key is that many fields came to the same conclusion independently. Here is a brief preview of some of the fields that make up evolution:

  • Fossil Record- The weight of the fossil record is twofold. First, you can make predictions on when the species lived and in what strata layer they will show up based on dating techniques. For the record, no fossil has ever been found in the wrong strata layer. Oh and also, the fossils found in the dated strata layer also matches the estimated dating techniques in genetics.
  • Geographical Distribution- Looks at species distribution and the relationships among species themselves and in relation to geography. So sorry Noah's Ark, your ship didn't sail. Unless you want to claim that when the flood went down, penguins waddled their way to Antarctica.
  • Domestic Selection- Man has their hand in evolution which has been demonstrated and documented in dog and pigeon breeding as well in the lab with everything from bacteria to flies.
  • Genetics- Every creationists nightmare. Genetics essentially put the proof in the pudding for the evidence of evolution. Even showing that natural selection does indeed work. Dawkins claimed that the one observation to refute creationism was the pattern of resemblances you see when you compare the genes, using modern DNA techniques, of any pair of animals and form a perfect family tree.
  • Development & Embryology- The study of the similarities between species during embryo development. Darwin originally made observations of this field in his 1859 publication, On the Origin of Species. It has gained recent popularity and is now dubbed Evolutionary Development or Evo-Devo.

In the coming posts I will lay out the evidence supporting each of these claims.


"Even as the evolution wars rage, on school boards and in courtrooms, biologists continue to accumulate empirical data supporting Darwinian theory."
- Wall Street Journal, April 7, 2006

Friday, May 21, 2010

LIFE 2.0


Life may be the most beautiful thing we have to cherish, but there is still widespread belief that 'life' is some sort of magic. Hopefully this will chip it away a bit.

This morning we awoke to one of the greatest breakthroughs in science. Craig Venter, Genomics pioneer, has synthetically created a living organism from inanimate chemicals. Thats right, we have created life in the lab, many said could not be done as we dont have the power to instill life. The tables have turned. While this opens the door to an array of applications, it still leaves questions such as the sequence of events that led to the evolution of life. But we now know it is no more a question that life can form from basic chemical structures. Now with current insights and technology, it shouldn't be long before deeper questions are answered.

"Venter is creaking open the most profound door in humanity's history, potentially peeking into its destiny," said Julian Savulescu, ethics professor at Oxford University

Venter is wisely keeping the exact protocols under wraps so this could not fall into the wrong hands, with the extreme leading to biochemical warfare. There is still so much work to be done from this point. Scientists still are not sure of all the possible applications of synthetic life, but know it is many. You can read the headlines here:

Venter is also the author of his book A Life Decoded: My Genome: My Life, which tells the story of his adventurous life and quest to sequence the Human Genome.